Search Results for "Prospective Effect"

844 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 844 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Debarment from Examination Due to Attendance Shortfall. Court Refuses to Interfere with Educational Institution's Attendance Policy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Holding That Minimum Attendance Requirement Is a Valid Academic Criterion.

The petitioner, a student, challenged the decision of the respondent educational institution debarring him from appearing in examinations due to failu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment Extending Period for Acquisition of Reserved Land Under Section 127(1) of MRTP Act Applies to Notices Served Before Amendment — Landowner's Right to Deemed Lapse Not Affected Retrospectively.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arising from a writ petition concerning the interpretation of Section 127(1) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Pre-emptive Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act for Undervalued Property. Appropriate Authority's Valuation Based on Comparable Sales Upheld as Reasonable.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by prospective buyers (Krishna Kumar Rawat & Ors.) and partly allowed the appeal by the Union of India against a H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Rent Control Cases, Upholds Appellate Court's Finding of No Tenancy. Landlord's Suit for Possession Fails as Tenant Proves Payment of Rent and Absence of Valid Termination Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The appellant, Radhyesham Ramkaran Choube, filed four second appeals (Second Appeal Nos. 4, 8, 11, and 16 of 2002) against a common judgment dated 10....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 26 of Bombay Civil Courts Act Prospective, Not Applicable to Pending Appeals. Amendment increasing pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.5 lakh does not apply to appeals already filed before the amendment came into force.

The Bombay High Court considered a reference arising from a learned Single Judge's order dated 4 March 2011, which formulated two questions regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Fresh Form G to Maximize Asset Value in CIRP of Raigarh Champa Rail Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. — Challenge Mechanism Under Regulation 39(1A)(b) of IBBI Regulations, 2016 Must Be Conducted Among Existing Resolution Applicants.

The appeal was filed by JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., acting as trustee of Rail December 2024 Trust, challenging the Impugned Order ...