Search Results for "Procedural illegality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Procedural illegality"

987 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 987 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of India's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The Court held that the arbitrator's award of interest on pre-reference period without contractual basis and failure to consider bank's counterclaim amounted to patent illegality and denial of opportunity.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award pass...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Penalty for Denial of Fair Hearing. Failure to Question Delinquent Under Rule 8(20) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Violates Mandatory Procedural Safeguard, and Tribunal Justified in Not Granting Liberty to Resume Inquiry After Retirement.

23 Jul 2021

The State of Maharashtra and its officers challenged a judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal that set aside penalty orders against a ret...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.

2 Nov 2022

The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Trade Mark Infringement Case — Allegation that FIR was Wrongly Registered Under Copyright Act to Bypass Procedures Under Trade Marks Act. Petitioner Contends Non-Compliance with Section 115(4) Proviso of Trade Marks Act, 1999 as Search and Seizure Conducted Without Opinion of Registrar.

8 Jul 2024

The petitioner, proprietor of an oil mill trading in gram flour under the brand 'MRS Ganapathi', filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Co...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused Under NDPS Act Due to Discrepancy Between Charge Sheet and Forensic Report, and Procedural Violations. Proceedings under Section 27 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Quashed as FSL Report Showed No Contraband and Search Violated Section 50.

10 Sep 2024

The petitioners, Hanumantha and Manjunatha, approached the High Court of Karnataka under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A NI Act for Pre-Amendment Offences. Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is Prospective and Cannot Apply to Complaints Filed Before Its Insertion on 1 September 2018.

1 Jul 2019

The case arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed in 2016 against the appellant G.J. Raja by the respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction — Civil Judge Cannot Direct Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in a Civil Suit. The order passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.) directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC in a civil suit is without jurisdiction and the consequential FIR is liable to be quashed.

24 Mar 2017

The applicants, Harischandra Vishwanath Chavan and Santosh Harischandra Chavan, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Search and Seizure Conducted by Karnataka Police in Maharashtra Without Jurisdiction — Warrant Issued by Magistrate Outside Territorial Limits Invalid Under CrPC. The court held that a Magistrate cannot issue a search warrant for execution outside his territorial jurisdiction without following Sections 78 or 79 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the seizure based on such invalid warrant is illegal.

7 May 2021

The petitioners, traders in Nagpur, Maharashtra, challenged the seizure of rice bags from their godowns by the Karnataka Police (respondent No.1) acti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in TADA Case — Confessional Statements Held Inadmissible Due to Procedural Violations. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Kidnapping and Murder of Vice-Chancellor Under Sections 302, 368, 365 RPC and Sections 3, 4 TADA Act.

20 Mar 2025

The case arises from the kidnapping and murder of Dr. Mushir-ul-Haq, Vice-Chancellor of Kashmir University, and his Personal Secretary Abdul Gani Zarg...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)