Search Results for "Procedural Review"

1275 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1275 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order Refusing Recall of CIRP Admission Order. Recall Application Under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 Not Maintainable as It Seeks Review of Merits, Not Correction of Clerical Error or Fraud.

The appellant, RCC E-Construct Pvt. Ltd., filed a Company Appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlords' Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Review Maintainable for Error of Law Apparent on Record. Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 not applicable to proceedings under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The dispute in this writ petition arises from an eviction suit filed by the landlords (respondents) against the tenant (petitioner) under Section 16(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...