Search Results for "Premature Application"

1186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Premature Retirement Based on Date of Birth Discrepancy. Petitioner's claim of correct date of birth as 1st June 1950 rejected as service record showed 18th March 1947 and no application for correction was made within reasonable time.

The petitioner, Yashwant G. Tambe, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging his premature retirement from the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Adding Accused Under Section 319 CrPC Before Evidence Stage — Premature Invocation of Power. Power under Section 319 CrPC cannot be exercised based on investigation statements before commencement of trial evidence, as held in Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab.

The applicants, five individuals, challenged an order dated 29.03.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar, in Sessions Case No. 35/2008,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Premature Retirement Order Against Employee in National Textile Corporation — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind. Order Set Aside as Corporation Failed to Consider Employee's Representation and Did Not Follow Its Own Premature Retirement Scheme.

The petitioner, Vasant Lalchand Shah, joined the National Textile Corporation (NTC) in December 1978 as a Weaving Master. He had prior experience of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Life Convict's Petition Seeking Premature Release After 14 Years. Court Holds That Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines As Category 3(d) Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Is Proper and Not Arbitrary.

The case involved a life convict seeking premature release after having served 14 years of actual imprisonment. The petitioner was convicted for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Premature Retirement Order of General Manager in Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited Due to Non-Compliance with Service Rules. Transfer Order Set Aside as Punitive Without Proper Inquiry Under Relevant Service Rules.

The petitioner, Ram Mohan Sharma, an ex-General Manager of Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited (MECL), challenged two orders: a transfer order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order for Lack of Prior Approval Based on Recorded Reasons. Chief Minister's Discretion Under Para 9(b) of Government Order No.DPAR 22 STR 2013 is Not Absolute.

The petitioner, Sri Rajashekar M., an Extension Officer in the Department of Backward Classes Welfare, challenged an order dated 25.09.2018 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Order in Writ Petition Seeking Premature Release of Life Convict. Court Analyzes Applicability of Supreme Court's Sukhdev Yadav Judgment on Sentence Interpretation.

The petitioner, a life convict serving sentence in Central Prison, Mysore, approached the High Court of Karnataka seeking a writ of mandamus for his i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Remission Policy Applicability Case — 2002 Policy Governs Convicts Sentenced Before 2008 Policy Came Into Effect. The Court held that the policy in force at the time of conviction applies, and subsequent policy cannot be applied retrospectively to deny remission.

The appellant, Parveen Kumar @ Parveen Chauhan, was convicted for the murder of a 12-year-old child on 3rd January 2009 under FIR No.670 of 2007. He w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Reserves Order on Interim Measures in Intellectual Property Dispute with Foreign Seated Arbitration. Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Questions Indian Court's Jurisdiction and Maintainability of Mandatory Injunction.

The applicant, a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in software development, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...