Search Results for "Pension Regulations"

364 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 364 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Special Pension to Ex-Serviceman. Special Pension Under Para 164 of Pension Regulations for Army, 1961 is Discretionary and Not a Vested Right, Tribunal's Order Set Aside.

The High Court of Madras allowed a writ petition filed by the Union of India challenging the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chennai Bench, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Navy Pension Regulation Denying Condonation for Voluntary Discharge. Regulation 82(a) of Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 21, 300A as it applies uniformly to sailors discharged at their own request.

The petitioners, six former sailors of the Indian Navy, were discharged from service on compassionate grounds. They had served between 14 and 15 years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Minimum Pension of Rs.375 to Pre-1986 Pensioner Absorbed in Public Sector Undertaking. Petitioner entitled to minimum pension under Clause 7.1 read with Clause 10(a) of Office Memorandum dated 16.04.1987 despite having drawn lump sum terminal benefits.

The petitioner, Anthony C. Monteiro, was a government servant in the Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Goa, as a Junior Stenogra...