Search Results for "PMLA"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Transfer of PMLA Case from Gurugram to Delhi on Petitioner's Prayer. Transfer granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure fair trial under Article 139A of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Amit Katyal, a promoter of M/s Krrish Realtech Pvt. Ltd., was involved in a real estate project in Gurugram. Several criminal cases we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in PMLA Case — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 Not Satisfied. High Court Erred in Holding Section 50 Statements Inadmissible and Ignoring Rigours of Section 45 PMLA.

The Supreme Court set aside the bail granted by the Patna High Court to Kanhaiya Prasad in a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laund...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in PMLA Case Seeking Venue Change from Lucknow to Ernakulam. Transfer Under Section 406 CrPC Not Granted as Accused Failed to Establish Exceptional Circumstances or That Place of Predicate Offence Determines PMLA Trial Venue Under Section 65 PMLA.

The Supreme Court considered a transfer petition filed by an accused in a Prevention of Money-laundering Act (PMLA) case seeking to transfer the proce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes ED Summons Issued Under PMLA to Accused in Predicate Offence Cases — Summons Under Section 50 PMLA Cannot Be Issued to Persons Not Named in ECIR or Arrested Under PMLA

The petitioners, Naresh Goyal and Anita Naresh Goyal, filed two separate criminal writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Special Court in Ghaziabad Lacked Jurisdiction as Money-Laundering Offence Allegedly Committed in Maharashtra, Under Section 44(1) of Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, Anti-C...