Search Results for "Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition to Strike Off Plaint in Owners Association Dispute — Suit Barred by Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Act, 1994 and Specific Relief Act, 1963. Owners Association lacked authority to sue for common areas; proper remedy was under the Act or arbitration.

26 Feb 2026

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by Hiranandani Amalfi Owners Association (petitioner) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

26 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reference of Questions of Law to Larger Bench in Review Petition — Maintainability of Reference Affirmed. The Court held that its power to refer questions of law to a larger bench in a review petition is not barred by Order XLVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and can be exercised under Article 142 to do complete justice.

10 Feb 2020

The judgment arises from a reference made by a three-judge bench in review petitions against the Supreme Court's 2018 judgment in Indian Young Lawyers...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff to Cross-Examine Hostile Witnesses Called by Defendant in Money Suit — Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The trial court's order treating DWs 3 and 4 as hostile and permitting the defendant to cross-examine them was set aside as premature and prejudicial to the plaintiff.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiff's Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Permitting Cross-Examination of Hostile Witnesses in Money Suit. The court held that Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, allows the court to permit cross-examination of a witness by the party who called him if the witness appears hostile, and such discretion is not limited to witnesses called by the opposite party.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Power Generator Against Termination of PPA — Holds That Failure to Secure Fuel Supply Agreement Does Not Justify Termination Where PPA Does Not Condition Power Supply on Specific Coal Source

2 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between M/s Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd. (appellant) and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and others (respondents), ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Design Infringement and Passing Off Case — Registered Design Owner Granted Protection Against Infringement. Court Confirms That Substantial Similarity to Registered Design Constitutes Infringement Under Section 22 of Designs Act, 2000, and That Interim Relief Is Properly Granted When Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Are Established.

20 Feb 2018

The present appeal was filed by the original defendants (Kalpesh R. Jain, Ravi Raut, and Ketan Panchal) against the order and judgment dated 06.12.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Company and Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Directors' Claim of Not Being In Charge of Business at Time of Cheque Issuance Fails to Rebut Presumption of Liability Under Section 141.

14 Mar 2017

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s. Jaimin Jewelery Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Accused No.1) and its directors, Gautam Mehta (Accu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

25 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order to Deposit Arrears in Eviction Suit Filed by Trust Against Former Employee. Court Holds That Small Cause Court Has Jurisdiction Over Eviction Suits Filed by Landlords Against Licensees Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

9 Sep 2010

The respondents, as trustees of M.F. Cama Ahornan Institute and M.M. Cama Education Fund, filed L.E. Suit No.96/143 of 2008 in the Court of Small Caus...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)