Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Adyaksha and Upadyaksha — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 as No Prior Notice Required for Special Meeting Convened by Prescribed Authority

The petitioners, who are members of Somaguddi Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Adyaksha (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Disqualified Member's Participation. Motion of no-confidence passed by 2/3rd majority held invalid as it required 3/4th majority of members entitled to sit and vote under Section 35(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Kishor Baburao Wadaskar Prasad, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Panchala in September 2015. The Gram Panchayat consisted of sev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha of Gram Panchayat — Motion Valid Despite Absence of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Smt. C. Pushpa, was the Adhyaksha (President) of K. Bettahalli Gram Panchayat. She filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Court upholds validity of motion passed by majority under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The petitioners, who were members of the Gram Panchayat of Moghamwadi, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the S...