Search Results for "Ministerial Act"

247 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Suits as Patents Were Revoked Prior to Filing. Summary Judgment Granted Under Order XIII-A CPC as Plaintiff Had No Locus Standi to Sue for Infringement of Revoked Patents.

The plaintiff, Bharat Bhogilal Patel, filed two suits for infringement of two patents granted in 2003. The defendants, TVS Electronics Ltd. and Kalelk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Floor Test in Madhya Pradesh Assembly Amid Resignation Controversy. Governor's Power to Direct Floor Test is Not Binding on Speaker; Resignations Require Verification.

The case arose from a political crisis in Madhya Pradesh where 22 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) belonging to the Indian National Congress...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd. in Creditors' Petitions and BIFR Recommendation. Company declared unable to pay debts and commercially insolvent; winding up ordered under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns multiple company petitions filed by creditors and the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) seeking the windi...