Search Results for "Mine Development and Production Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Mine Development and Production Agreement"

81 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

1 Aug 2026

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Mining Lease Renewal — Lease Deemed Expired Under Section 8A of MMDR Act, 1957. The petitioner's mining lease for iron ore in Goa expired on 22.11.2007, and the renewal application was rejected; no automatic extension under Section 8A as the lease had already expired.

8 May 2026

The petitioners, Shantilal Khushaldas & Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Mukesh M. Saglani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.11....

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Extension of Letter of Intent for Mining Lease. Court upholds State's decision that extension cannot be granted beyond the maximum period of five years under Rule 7(4) of the Minerals (Evidence of Mineral Contents) Rules, 2015.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited, a cement manufacturing company, participated in a bid process initiated by the State of Maharashtra fo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NCBC Notices for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Commission Cannot Summon Out-of-State Entity. Notices issued by National Commission for Backward Classes to Karnataka Power Corporation Limited for proceedings in Maharashtra held without jurisdiction under Article 338B of the Constitution of India.

19 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Karnataka Power Corporation Limited, a Government of India undertaking based in Bengaluru, challenged three notices dated 28-02-2024, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Mining Company's Challenge to Stoppage Notice Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Two-Year Mining Period Expired. Lease Deed Executed on 18.04.2022 Permitted Mining for Maximum Two Years or Till Stage II Approval, Whichever Earlier; Court Held That the Stoppage Notice Was Valid and No Interference Warranted.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/S Minera Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd., a mining company, challenged a stoppage notice dated 08.04.2024 issued by the Deputy Conservator...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates on Transfer of Forest Clearance Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Extension of Letter of Intent. Petitioners challenged show-cause notices and refusal to transfer forest clearance, invoking Supreme Court order in Samaja Parivartana Samudaya and Section 8B of MMDR Act.

27 Sep 2023

The matter involved three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Appointment Application for Lack of Jurisdiction — Venue Designation in Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Seat of Arbitration. Court holds that mere mention of 'venue' in arbitration clause without specifying 'seat' does not vest jurisdiction in courts at the venue, especially when subject matter lies outside its territorial limits.

21 Mar 2023

The applicant, Honey Bee Multitrading Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in mustard oil manufacturing with its plant in Ganganagar, Rajasthan, entered into ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Lease Dispute — Failure to Nominate Arbitrator Despite Arbitration Clause. Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where a party fails to appoint an arbitrator, the court may appoint one.

24 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Satyam Cineplexes Limited, a company engaged in managing multiplex cinema halls, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)