Search Results for "Meeting Rules, 1959"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Meeting Rules, 1959"

453 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 453 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Section 35(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Meeting Convened Without Required Notice Period.

5 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Parmanand Upwanshi, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Murdada, in November/December 2012. Respondent nos. 3 to 8 moved the Ta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Panchayat No-Confidence Motion Dispute — MP's Inclusion for Quorum and Vote Upheld. The Court held that the Member of Parliament representing the Union Territory is a member of the Panchayat Samiti with full voting rights, including in no-confidence motions, under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Panchayats) Regulation, 1994.

1 May 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the inclusion of a Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Island...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

15 Nov 2006

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Petitioner's removal upheld as meeting complied with procedural requirements under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Rules.

21 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode, was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talegaon Dashasar. On 05.12.2016, a no confidence motion was pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case — Caste Validity Certificate Issue Not Decided by Competent Authority, No Right to Speak in No-Confidence Meeting.

18 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Yogini w/o Sanjay Deshmukh, was the elected Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mandawa. A no-confidence motion was initiated against her, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

17 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Delegate Nomination Dispute in Karnataka Milk Federation; Interim Order Allows Petitioner to Cast Sealed Vote. Challenge to Regional Commissioner's Authority Under Section 28-A(4-B) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

7 Apr 2020

The writ petitions concerned a dispute over the nomination of a delegate to the apex milk co-operative federation in Karnataka. The petitioner was a m...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Administrative Tribunal Order in Devasthan Management Dispute — Appointment of Ad Hoc Committee Without Election Violates Devasthan Regulations. The Court held that the Administrator cannot appoint an ad hoc committee to manage the temple without holding elections as mandated by the Regulations.

3 Feb 2006

The petitioners, who are Mahajans of Shree Bhumika Devasthan at Chopdem, Pernem, Goa, challenged the order dated 21.05.2001 passed by the Administrati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)