102 result(s) found
Judicial Review of Court Martial Proceedings: The High Court, under Article 226, can review Court Martial proceedings if there is a denial of fundamen...
1. Background: The appellant, Sikandar Somsingh Chavhan, was convicted for rape under Section 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5(k), and 6 of the POC...
The Supreme Court of India, upheld the rights of individuals with disabilities to pursue higher education. The appellant, Omkar Gond, who has a 45% s...
1. Introduction and Case Background: Facts: The appellants were convicted for gang rape under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, and 506 (II) of t...
The Bombay High Court examined the evidence against the accused, initially convicted of rape under Section 376-AB IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCS...
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal of Gajanan More, who was convicted under Section 376-AB of the IPC and Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the POCSO Ac...
The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench acquitted the appellant, Anil Chhotelal Chhevle, previously convicted under Section 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act, ...
The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, acquitted Rahul Rajabhau Pistulkar and Aditya @ Shubham Yevale, convicted under Sections 3(b), 4(2), 5(m), and 6 ...
The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, acquitted Appellant in a case under Section 376(2)(i) of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The appellant wa...
The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for sexual offences under the POCSO Act and Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Se...
