Search Results for "Marks Disclosure"

381 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Murder of Four Family Members in Brutal Robbery-Murder Case. Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 449, 460, 201 IPC for Killing Two Adults and Two Children in Their Flat.

The case arises from a brutal murder of four members of a family in their flat in Pune. The accused, Bhagwat Bajirao Kale, was a labourer working at a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Plaintiff's Conduct of Suppressing Prior User and Earlier Litigation Disentitles It to Equitable Relief Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957.

The suit was filed by ITC Limited against NTC Industries Ltd. for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off in relation to cigarettes and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RTI Disclosure of Contractual Information Between Private Companies and Government. Information Sought Relates to Public Activity and Falls Under Section 2(h) of RTI Act as 'Public Authority'.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s Shonkh Technology International Ltd. and M/s United Telecom Limited challenging orders of the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...