WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011
26 May 2025...
Search Results for "Malad"
357 result(s) found
Found 357 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Addressed Appeal and Writ Petition by Elevator Company Challenging Procurement Eligibility Clause in JICA Loan Agreement — Controversy Centered on Constitutionality of Nationality Restriction Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India and Section 27 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.
11 Mar 2025The matter arose from writ petitions and writ appeals filed by OTIS Elevator Company (India) Limited before the Madras High Court. The appellant chall...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excess One-Time Premium in ULC Act Repeal Case — Premium Chargeable Only on Exempted Surplus Vacant Land. The court held that the one-time premium under the 2019 GR and 2021 GR cannot be levied on retainable land, only on exempted surplus land under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
7 Aug 2024The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.429/1/2 and CTS No.1069-A/A-1 and 1069-A/B-1, sought a refund of Rs.2,66,75,750/- paid as one-time p...
- 596
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.
22 Jul 2024The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...
- 422
High Court
Bombay High Court Declares Arrest Illegal for Non-Compliance with Article 22(1) and Section 50 Cr.P.C. — Failure to Communicate Grounds of Arrest in Writing Renders Arrest and Subsequent Remand Void. The court held that the constitutional mandate under Article 22(1) requires grounds of arrest to be communicated in writing, and oral communication is insufficient, vitiating the arrest and all subsequent remand orders.
18 Jul 2024The petitioner was arrested on 22 February 2024 in connection with C.R. No.68 of 2020 registered at Malad Police Station for offences under Sections 4...
- 1782
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 394, 397, 307, 341 read with 120-B IPC and Arms Act set aside as sole reliance on interested witness testimony without independent corroboration found unsafe.
6 Feb 2023The appellant, Mohd. Shoab Shaukatali Mansuri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 341, 394,...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as extra-judicial confession to police officer is barred by Section 25 of Evidence Act and recovery of weapon does not establish guilt.
15 Jan 2020The appellant, Shashikant Shantaram Bhandari, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his aunt Vatsala under Section 302 of the Indian Pena...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurer Liable Jointly and Severally with Employer for Employee's Injuries. Employer's Failure to Deposit Compensation Attracts Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
3 Jan 2020The case involves an appeal by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against a judgment of the learned Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation and Judge, Elev...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Between Parents and Son — Orders Compliance with Consent Terms for Possession and Mesne Profits. Court holds that consent terms recorded in earlier proceedings are binding and executable, and that the trial court erred in dismissing the application for compliance without considering the binding nature of the consent order.
11 Oct 2018The appellants, Nandlal Kewalramani and Shobhadevi Kewalramani, are the parents of respondent No.1, Rajesh Nandlal Kewalramani. The dispute pertains t...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Will Dispute Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Valid Execution. Will dated 17.12.1985 alleged to be executed by Joseph George Gomes was contested by caveators on grounds of undue influence and lack of testamentary capacity; court found that the propounder failed to dispel suspicious circumstances surrounding the will.
9 Nov 2006The case concerns a testamentary petition filed by Nancy Joe Vaz (plaintiff) seeking letters of administration with the will annexed of her brother Jo...
- 107
