Search Results for "Major penalty"

925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer Order in ONGC — No Violation of Service Rules Found. Transfer order issued on administrative grounds upheld as petitioner failed to establish mala fides or breach of transfer policy.

The petitioner, Rajinder Paul Bharadwaj, was working as Manager (MM) in the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) at Mumbai. He was transferred ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty Order by Head Master in Private School Employment Dispute -- Assistant Teacher Challenges Withheld Increment Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act 1977 and Rules 1981 -- Head Master Lacks Authority to Impose Penalty Without Management Resolution

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher in a private school, challenged a penalty order imposed by the Head Master that withheld his annual increment -- ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Revision Against SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Discharge in SEBI Prosecution for Non-Payment of Penalty. Vicarious Liability of Directors Under Section 27 SEBI Act Questioned Due to Absence of Specific Averments in Complaint.

The matter arose from four Criminal Revision Applications filed before the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order of the SEBI Special Court t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition in Disciplinary Proceeding Against Government Employee for Unauthorized Absence. Penalty of Withholding One Increment for One Year Upheld as Proportionate for Misconduct Involving Absence Without Permission and Verbal Altercation with Manager.

The State of Maharashtra and its officers filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case. Journal Entry Set-off for Loan Repayment Does Not Violate Section 269T of Income Tax Act, 1961, as It Is Not a Repayment but an Adjustment of Mutual Claims.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted the penalty ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...