Search Results for "Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act"

938 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 938 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.

The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election Authority's Order Excluding Primary Milk Societies from Voters List for Federal Society Elections. Cut-off Date for Membership Eligibility Must Be Prospective and Not Retrospective Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, two primary milk cooperative societies, were members of the respondent no.4 federal society (Pune Zillha Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Administrator in Cooperative Society Due to Expiry of Managing Committee Term and Failure to Hold Elections. Members of Specified Cooperative Society Entitled to Mandamus Under Section 73G of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, Dnyandeo Mohan Salunke and Popatrao Baburao Jadhav, are members of the MulaPravara Electric Cooperative Society Ltd., a specified coo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Against Cooperative Bank's SARFAESI Recovery Proceedings. Employees Held Not to Be 'Borrowers' and Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Auction Sale Without Payment of Dues.

The judgment pertains to a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by retired employees of Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. against the dismissal of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment for Non-Compliance with Section 22 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) set aside as notice of meeting did not contain proposed amendment.

The petitioner, Sadguru University CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) of the respondent society, Sadguru Premi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...