Search Results for "MSMED Act 2006"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator for Micro Enterprise Against Central Railway Under MSMED Act, 2006. Conciliation Failed, Arbitration Agreement Exists, Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and a micro enterprise under the Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MSME Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on admission of liability and failure to object to jurisdiction before Facilitation Council.

The petitioner, Nexus Infratech, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses MSME Appeals Holding Restructuring Notification Directory. Banks/NBFCs Not Obliged to Restructure MSME Accounts Suo Moto Under Section 9 MSMED Act Before SARFAESI Action.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by MSMEs challenging the Bombay High Court's order that Banks/NBFCs are not obliged to adopt the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Prior Conciliation Under MSMED Act, 2006 — Council's Failure to Refer to Arbitration Does Not Bar Court's Power

The petitioner, M/s. Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, had entered into a contract with t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Council Award for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Arbitration Procedure Under MSMED Act. Council's Order Without Proper Conciliation and Arbitration Proceedings Held Invalid.

The appellant, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, successor of Jharkhand State Electricity Board, entered into a contract with respondent No.3, M/s. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MSEFC Award for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Buyer Outside Maharashtra. Territorial Jurisdiction of Facilitation Council Under Section 18 of MSMED Act, 2006 Cannot Extend to Buyers Located Outside Its Territorial Limits.

The petitioner, Gujarat State Petronet Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, ...