Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

581 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Employer to Bear Advocate Costs for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 — Held that Industrial Court exceeded jurisdiction by imposing financial burden on employer without legal basis.

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, in Revision App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Jurisdiction in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments Held Not Owned or Controlled by Central Government, State Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction.

The Petitioner, Institute of Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments, an autonomous body, challenged a common order passed by the Industrial Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Transfer Dispute. Industrial Court's Refusal to Stay Transfer Orders Upheld as No Prima Facie Case of Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU and PULP Act.

The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Revision Applications as Time-Barred Under MRTU & PULP Act. Limitation for Revision under Section 44 is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers between 1979 and 1991. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Provide Facilities to Recognised Union Under MRTU and PULP Act. Recognised Union Entitled to Same Facilities as Unrecognised Union Under Section 20 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, challenged an order dated 31.8.2005 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 919 of 2001. The respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court Order Dismissing Revision as Time-Barred. Limitation for Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers and worked from 1979 to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Workman for Habitual Absenteeism in MRTU and PULP Act Complaint. Concurrent findings of fact by Labour Court and Industrial Court not interfered with under writ jurisdiction as no perversity or violation of natural justice established.

The petitioner, Francis Xavier, was employed by M/s. Magna Graphics (I) Pvt. Ltd. and was dismissed on 24 August 1995 for habitual absenteeism. He cha...