Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Labour Court Order Holding Termination of Trainees as Unfair Labour Practice. Trainees performing regular work for over 240 days deemed permanent workmen under Model Standing Orders, termination without Section 25F compliance illegal.

The petitioners, M/s Mukand Limited and others, challenged an order of the Labour Court at Thane and the revisional order of the Industrial Court at T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Jurisdiction in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Institute for Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments Held Not Owned or Controlled by Central Government, State Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction.

The Petitioner, Institute of Design of Electrical Measuring Instruments, an autonomous body, challenged a common order passed by the Industrial Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Remands Disproportionate Punishment Case to Industrial Court for Fresh Determination of Quantum. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU & PULP Act Upheld, but Remand Ordered for Proper Application of Proportionality Principle.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint under MRTU & PULP Act. Direct Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Industrial Court Can Assume Jurisdiction.

Mahindra & Mahindra Limited filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Industrial Court which had dismissed its a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits MSRTC Officers in Disobedience Case — Dismissal Order Issued Before Receipt of Interim Protection Order. Wilful Disobedience Under Section 48(1) of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 Not Established as Order Was Passed Prior to Knowledge of Interim Direction.

The petitioners, Madhukar Shrirang Sonwane and Dattratraya Nivruti Bhelonde, were officers of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Denial of Termination. Employer's Affidavit Stating No Termination Occurred Renders Complaint Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 Infructuous.

The petitioner, M/s Satish Motors Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court directing it to deposit three months' wages in a complaint filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Transfer Dispute. Workman's Compliance with Transfer Order Renders Complaint Infructuous; Interim Relief Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s NRB Bearings Limited, challenged an order dated 08/07/2015 passed by the Industrial Court, Jalna, in Complaint (ULP) No.56/2015. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practices in MRTU & PULP Act Case. Employer directed to reinstate employee with full back wages and permanency benefits for engaging in unfair labour practices under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in supply of textile machinery and civil construction, challenged th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Industrial Court Order Dismissing ULP Complaint for Non-Implementation of Labour Court Award. Doctrine of Election Permits Employee to Choose Remedy Under MRTU & PULP Act Despite Availability of Execution Under ID Act.

The petitioner, Dhannu Bhagu Rathod, was a workman who had his termination challenged before the Labour Court in Reference (IDA) No.2/2015. The Labour...