WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2019
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "MRTP Act"
443 result(s) found
Found 443 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within 10 Years. Petitioners' land reserved for school purposes not acquired despite notice; court declares reservation lapsed and directs publication of notification.
24 Feb 2025The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gat No. 105/2+3 at Village Bale, Solapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking ...
- 772
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.
1 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...
- 415
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.
1 Jul 2024The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...
- 661
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioner's Land Reservation Lapses Automatically Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 as Respondents Did Not Issue Declaration Under Section 126.
9 Dec 2022The petitioner, Purshotam Vishandas Raheja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Reservation for Public Garden in Kolhapur Development Plan. Reservation under Section 22 of MRTP Act, 1966 for public garden upheld as valid and not arbitrary, rejecting claims of delay and hardship.
13 Oct 2014The judgment concerns two connected matters: a writ petition filed by 15 members of the Jamsandekar family and a public interest litigation filed by P...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Reservations in Development Plan for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Reservation for MSEB extension and school/playground lapsed due to failure to acquire land within statutory period.
6 Oct 2014The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Reservations in Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Reservations for MSEB Extension and School/Playground Quashed as Not Acquired Within 10 Years, Land Deemed De-reserved.
6 Oct 2014The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.
19 Mar 2012The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lack of Title. Petitioners failed to prove ownership of the acquired land, and the acquisition was for a public purpose under the MRTP Act, 1966.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain lands in Kolhapur, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for road widening...
- 116
