Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Bail Order and Supply Documents Violates Right to Representation.

The petitioner, Vishal Manik Dambe, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11th May 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Issued Under Section 3 of the Act Against a 70-Year-Old for Alleged Dangerous Activities.

The criminal writ petition arose from a preventive detention order issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Defective Translation of Grounds of Detention. Error in Translating CR Number in Marathi Version Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Sunil Bharat Govari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider All Grounds of Detention. Single Case in Paragraph 4(a) Considered, Paragraph 5 Ignored, Vitiated Order.

The petitioner, Suman Sudhakar Jadhav, mother of the detenu Ganesh Sudhakar Jadhav @ Kalya Ganya, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Did Not Show Prejudicial Activity After Release.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Chandrakant Prabhakar Todankar, challenged the detention order dated 19th August 2004 passed under the Maharashtra ...