Search Results for "MHADA cancellation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MHADA cancellation"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Irrevocable Consents by Occupants Upheld. Court holds that once occupants have given unconditional irrevocable consents for redevelopment, they cannot subsequently withdraw or revoke them, and the High Power Committee's approval based on such consents is valid.

14 Jun 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the proposed redevelopment of a plot of land admeasuring 3297.68...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2018

3 Jun 2019

The judgment, rendered on 3 June 2019 by Justice G.S. Kulkarni of the Bombay High Court, was a writ petition concerning a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

26 Apr 2006

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

High Court

FIRST APPEAL NO.514 OF 2014

16 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a suit dismissed by the trial court for mandatory injunction seeking execution of an agreement for sale of a flat under the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Tender Process for Lease of Plots. Court holds that CIDCO's decision to cancel tender without valid reasons and without issuing show-cause notice to highest bidders is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

20 Apr 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Aditya Enterprises and Mahaavir Superstructures Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challenging the decision of the City and Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

17 Oct 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits PIL Challenging Construction Permissions in Gamdevi Heritage Precinct. The court considered legality of 15-storey building under DCR 1991 and Heritage Regulations.

22 Jul 2025

By way of background, the petitioners, Gamdevi Residents’ Association and others, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

9 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of NOC Requirement from Naval Authorities for Slum Rehabilitation Project. Security Guidelines and Stop Work Notice Challenged as Arbitrary and Without Statutory Backing.

23 Dec 2013

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition on Urban Land Ceiling Act Repeal and Possession — Court Analyzes Validity of Dispossession Under Section 10(5) and (6) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

24 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Vijay Kisan Kate, approached the High Court of Bombay by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)