Search Results for "MCGM scheme"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Unauthorized Construction and Inaction by Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued to MCGM to Act Within Four Weeks. Resident's Locus Standi Upheld Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Sections 351, 354, 355A, 488.

The petitioner, Dr. Rahul Jain, a resident of Borivali West, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Claim for 50% Concession on Premium Under Covid-19 Rebate Scheme — Government Resolution dated 14.01.2021 Held Applicable to Projects with Pending Premium Payments Despite Prior Commencement Certificates

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a developer, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that it is entitled to a 50% concession on the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM Petition Challenging Compassionate Appointment to Son of Deceased Employee. Compassionate appointment is an exception to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and the scheme must be interpreted liberally to provide immediate succor to the family in penury.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MCGM Circular Denying Compassionate Appointment to Family of Employee Medically Invalidated After Age 50. The court held that the age bar of 50 years is reasonable and not arbitrary, and the rejection of the son's application was valid.

The petitioners, Pratibha Sanjay Padamalwar (widow) and Ashitosh Sanjay Padamalwar (son), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge Order in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Court Receiver Directed to Hand Over Possession to Plaintiff. Held that the Court Receiver's appointment was proper and the appeal lacked merit.

The appellants, who are partners of Crescent Builders, filed an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge in Suit No.1512 of 2009. The Singl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Licences for Unauthorised Construction on Gaothan Land. Petitioners Failed to Establish Right to Regularisation Under Development Control Regulations.

The petitioners, various societies and associations, filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their trade licences by the Municipal Corpor...