Search Results for "MCGM guidelines"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple Structure at Vaidya Wadi. Court holds that the structure was not a protected monument and the petitioners lacked locus standi.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by four individuals claiming to be residents and devotees of a temple located at Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by NGOs Challenging Revocation of Allotment of Municipal Gymnasium Centres. Court upholds MCGM's right to revoke allotment for non-compliance with terms and public interest, rejecting claims of legitimate expectation and violation of natural justice.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two appeals filed by NGOs, Samantawadi Mahila Vikas Foundation and Mumbaikar Peace and Welfare Society, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Redevelopment Permission in CRZ Areas Due to Minimum Plot Size Requirement. Court Upholds MCGM's Decision That Development Control Regulations Do Not Permit Relaxation of Minimum Plot Size for Redevelopment in Coastal Regulation Zone.

The petitioners, including the Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industries and various real estate companies, filed writ petitions challenging the refus...