Search Results for "Legal Evidence"

17185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation of wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nilesh Laxmikant Vyas, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for the murder of his wife, Neha @ Pooja, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Satish Bansi Lagad, Bansi Kisan Lagad, Kisan Ganpat Lagad, and Aashabai Bansi Lagad, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses.

The appellant, Anil Shrawan More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for smashing head with stone set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kurashid Mohd. Umar Ghori, was convicted by the 8th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai on 21st June 2008 in Sessions Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence. Appeal Under Section 378 CrPC Challenges Acquittal for IPC Sections 302, 201, 404, 419 Based on Defective Recovery, Delay in FIR, and Unestablished Last Seen.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) CrPC against the judgment of acquittal dated 08.08.2013 passed by the Fast Track C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. Accused Strangulated Wife and Staged Suicide; Conviction Upheld Based on Daughter's Credible Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant by the trial court for the murder of his wife Girijamma and causing disappearance of evidence by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Death Sentence in Confirmation Case for Kidnap, Rape and Murder of 5-Year-Old Girl — Circumstantial Evidence Proved Guilt. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 363, 376(2)(f), and 201 Based on Last Seen, Preparation, and Medical Evidence Held Unassailable.

The case arose from the kidnap, rape, and murder of a five-year-old girl, Chakuli, in Nerli village, Kolhapur district, on the night of 24 October 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case arises from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and rioting...