Search Results for "Laches"

687 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 687 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition After 38 Years, Citing Delay and Laches. Petition Barred by Inordinate Delay – Abuse of Process of Law – Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 – Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Delay and Laches: The Court held that a petition filed after an inordinate delay, without any justification, is barred by the principles of delay and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Addition of Defence Service as Qualifying Service for Pension — Ex-Serviceman Entitled to Count Military Service Under Rule 3 of KPTCL Pension Regulations, 1999.

The petitioner, Sri R. Hanumatha Singh, an ex-serviceman who served in the Indian Air Force from 31.01.1972 to 08.05.1987, later joined the Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Allowing Change of Date of Birth of IAS Officer. Authorities' Delay in Deciding Application for Correction of Date of Birth Cannot Be Used to Defeat Claim Under Rule 38 of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

The Union of India and the State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 8 March 2016 passed by the Central A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Vacancy of Panchayat Seat and Quo Warranto Against Panch. Petitioner Failed to Establish That Respondent No. 2 Was Disqualified Under Section 10(1)(c) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 for Having More Than Two Children.

The petitioner, Mr. Mansoor Mulla, a citizen and voter from Ward No. 9 of Curti, Ponda, Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...