Search Results for "KIADB"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Permits Withdrawal of Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIADB Act Due to Unsigned Memo. Petitioner allowed to withdraw petition subject to counsel signing memo, disposing of the matter without adjudication on merits.

The petitioner, Sri Munigangaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the preliminary notificati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal and Petition Challenging KIADB Land Allotment — No Pre-existing Right of Appellant Established. Allotment to Third Party Upheld as Valid Under KIAD Act, 1966.

The appellant, Garden City Fashions Pvt Ltd, filed a writ appeal and a writ petition challenging the allotment of land by the Karnataka Industrial Are...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is committed at the place of dishonour and service of notice, which was Delhi, not Bangalore.

The petitioners, Sri Devidas Garg, Smt. Amita Garg, and Sri Santhosh Kumar Garg, filed two criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Industrial Development Due to Non-Compliance with Section 28 of KIADB Act, 1966. Preliminary Notification Lapsed as Final Notification Not Issued Within Prescribed Period of Two Years.

The petitioners, landowners from Gavenahalli Village, Hassan Taluk and District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...