Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act"

394 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 394 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Under Article 227, Sets Aside Industrial Court's Finding That Fire Brigade Department Is Not Industrial Establishment -- Matter Remanded For Fresh Consideration

The petitioner, Mumbai Fire Services Union, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the Industrial Court's findin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal in Service Dispute, Sets Aside Back-Wages Award for Exceeding Pleadings. Appellate Court Erred in Granting Back-Wages Without Claim and Without Considering Jurisdiction of Civil Court Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Amreli Nagarpalika and another against Ashwinbhai Shantilal Goradia, challenging the judgment and decree of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Reference in Industrial Dispute Against Minority School — Lack of Jurisdiction Under Industrial Disputes Act. School Employee's Dispute Not an 'Industrial Dispute' as School is Not an 'Industry' Under Section 2(j) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Amalorpavam Higher Secondary School, an unaided private minority school recognized under the National Commission for Minority Educatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Retirement Age of Workmen. Workmen who opted for NTC service conditions cannot claim retirement at 60 years under earlier settlement and award.

The petitioners, workmen of India United Mills, Mumbai, which was taken over by the National Textile Corporation under the Sick Textiles Undertakings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practices in MRTU & PULP Act Case. Employer directed to reinstate employee with full back wages and permanency benefits for engaging in unfair labour practices under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in supply of textile machinery and civil construction, challenged th...