Search Results for "Industrial Court revision"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Remand Order in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Maintainability of Complaint Must Be Decided on Merits Without Remand. Relationship of Employer-Employee Must Be Admitted or Undisputed for Complaint Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act to Be Maintainable.

The petitioners, employees of the Forest Department, filed Complaint (ULP) 13/2010 before the Labour Court, Yavatmal, alleging unfair labour practices...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MIDC's Demand for Service Charges at Allegedly Agreed Rate. Service charges must be based on statutory notification under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, not private negotiation.

The petitioner, Federation of Association of Industries, through its President Shyamsundar Vasudev Agrawal, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement of Daily Wager Denied Due to Lack of Continuous Service. Employee failed to prove 240 days of continuous service in preceding year, disentitling him to protection under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the appellant) challenging the judgment of a learne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Anganwadi Sevika with Full Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Industrial Court's Revision Order Restoring Continuity and Back Wages Upheld as Termination Found Unjustified Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioners, the Zilla Parishad and the Child Development Project Officer, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 17/09/2013 in Rev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSRTC's Challenge to Industrial Court Order on Special Allowance Ceiling. Unilateral Reduction of Special Allowance from 5% to 2.5% of Basic Pay Held as Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (MPSRTC), challenged the orders dated 19th and 21st March 1996 passed by the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction by National Textile Corporation. Division Bench precedent upholding rollback from 60 to 58 years held binding.

The petitioners, three employees of India United Mills prior to its nationalization under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalization) Act, 1974, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order for Full Back Wages and Retrenchment Compensation to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Company's Claim of Financial Difficulty and Closure Not Sufficient to Deny Workmen's Entitlement Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, D.G.P.Windsor (India) Ltd., challenged an order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Complaint (ULP) No....