Search Results for "Indian Telegraph Act, 1885"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 15903 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows District Collector's Appeal in Electricity Line Obstruction Case. Unauthorized Construction Under High-Tension Line Not Entitled to Exemplary Damages; Authorities Acted Lawfully Under Section 68(5) of Electricity Act, 2003.

The case arose from a writ petition filed by a landowner seeking exemplary damages against the District Collector and Tamil Nadu Electricity Board for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Wireless Telegraphy Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 155(2) CrPC. FIR registered without prior permission of Magistrate for non-cognizable offence under Section 6 of Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act read with Section 20 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, held invalid.

The petitioner, Anderson Mark Richard, a British national and former Senior Executive of Offshore Petroleum Industry Training Organization, filed a cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Panchayat Notice Against Telecom Tower Operator for Lack of Authority Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Panchayat Cannot Interfere with Licensed Telecom Infrastructure Sharing as It Falls Under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and DoT Guidelines.

The petitioner, Tower Vision India Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act and licensed by the Ministry of Communications, Depar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Telecom Billing Dispute — Claim Barred by Section 15 of TRAI Act, 1997. Counterclaim for unpaid bills upheld with 12% interest as petitioner failed to challenge tariff orders before TRAI or Appellate Tribunal.

The petitioner, M/s. Kansan Communications Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Reconnection of Telephone Lines Disconnected Without Notice. Disconnection of Telephone Facilities Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885.

The petitioner, Shri Ajay Madhukar Thakur, was a consumer of telephone services provided by the respondents, who were officials of Bharat Sanchar Niga...