Search Results for "Hamal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Hamal"

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Ticket Recovery. Recovery of a valid ticket from the deceased's pocket establishes passenger status, and the Railways' failure to rebut the presumption under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 entitles dependants to compensation.

23 Mar 2021

The appellants, being the widow, sons, and mother of the deceased Suresh Gharat, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promotion Approval for Handicapped Employee in Grant-in-Aid School — Education Officer Cannot Reject on Grounds Not Specified in MEPS Rules. Promotion from Peon to Junior Clerk based on seniority and roster upheld as valid under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

22 Feb 2021

The petitioners, including Sangramsinh Bhausaheb Ghule (petitioner no.1), Marutrao Ghule Patil Shikshan Sanstha (petitioner no.2 society), and the Hea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Ex Gratia Payment Under Section 7(2)(xiv) of Maharashtra Mathadi Act Does Not Bar Workmen's Compensation Claim. The court interpreted Section 16 of the 1977 Act as not precluding a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, since ex gratia payment is not compensation under the 1923 Act.

19 Aug 2019

The case involves a reference by a Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court on the question whether an employee who has received ex gra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

26 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Railway Employee Against CAT Order Dismissing Pension Claim on Limitation. Delay Caused by Employer's Criminal Negligence Cannot Bar Substantive Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

27 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath Nathoo Bari, a retired Junior Clerk of the Chief Security Commissioner's Office, Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Railway Employee Challenging CAT Order Dismissing Pension Claim on Limitation Grounds. Delay Caused by Respondent's Negligence Cannot Bar Substantive Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

27 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath Nathoo Bari, a retired Junior Clerk of the Chief Security Commissioner's Office, Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Government Resolution Providing Preference to Locals in Appointment of Peon in Private School — Schedule F to MEPS Rules Does Not Provide for Promotion but Only Preference. The Court held that the Government Resolution dated 15th April 1991 is valid and Schedule F provides only a preference in appointment, not a right to promotion under the MEPS Act, 1977.

26 Oct 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by Tanaji Madhukar Barbade against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner was appointed as a peon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Minimum Wages. Establishment Classified as Engineering Industry Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Entitling Workers to Minimum Wages and Attendance-cum-Wage Cards.

18 Aug 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by M/s Asia Foundation & Construction Limited challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, dated 12/1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that keeping workmen as temporaries for years constituted an unfair labour practice under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

16 Mar 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by Century Rayon (a division of Century Textiles & Industries Ltd.) challenging an order of the Industr...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)