Search Results for "Grindlays Bank"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Industrial Dispute Over Ex-Parte Award. Labour Court's Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Award Upheld for Lack of Sufficient Cause Under Rule 26(1) of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957.

The petitioner, Kiran Machine Tools, a proprietory concern, challenged an order dated 14th May 1996 passed by the Presiding Officer of the IInd Labour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Workers' Union Seeking Impleadment of Holding Company in Industrial Dispute. Holding Company Not a Necessary Party in Reference Proceedings Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, Globe Ground India Employees Union, filed an industrial dispute challenging the closure of M/s Globe Ground India Private Ltd. (second ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petitions in FERA Prosecution — Exoneration in Adjudication Not a Bar to Criminal Proceedings. Adjudication and criminal prosecution under FERA are independent proceedings with different standards of proof and objectives.

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of orders passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Exparte Labour Court Award for Violation of Natural Justice. Employer Denied Opportunity to Defend Due to Non-Service of Notice, Award Set Aside and Matter Remanded.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the employer, the Deputy Engineer of Zilla Parishad Constructions, challenging an exparte award p...