Search Results for "Forest Offence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Forest Offence"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Discharge in Corruption Case — No Ground to Interfere with Concurrent Findings. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988 and Sections 471/477A/120-B IPC.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Susanta Kumar Dalei against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had dismissed his discharge ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet, with recovery of weapons under Arms Act, 1959.

18 May 2023

The case pertains to the murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet on 31.10.2001. The deceased was last seen with the appellants Shabbir and Ravi Mandal (along with ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Vehicle Pending Trial in Wildlife Protection Act Case - Magistrate Has Jurisdiction Under Section 451 CrPC. The court held that Section 50(4) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 does not bar the Magistrate from releasing seized property under Section 451 CrPC, and the special provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 do not apply when seizure is under the Wildlife Protection Act.

21 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Sarika Nitin Salunkhe, is the owner of a truck bearing registration No. MH-09-EM-8479. On 26th October 2020, Forest Authorities interc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tree Preservation Act Case — Suit Not Barred by Section 28 as Act Not Applicable to Private Trees. Notices for compounding fees under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 were invalid because the Act did not apply to trees on private land not covered by a notified area.

14 Jan 2021

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No.18/1991/A in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim, seeking a declarati...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove illegal transportation of sandalwood beyond reasonable doubt.

26 Nov 2019

The petitioners, four individuals, were convicted by the Trial Court (Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi) in C.C. No. 5462/2006 for an offence under Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Identification and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 104-A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

26 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Asim @ Asham, Dadapeer, and Muruga, were convicted by the Trial Court for an offence punishable under Section 104-A of the Karnataka ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against IFS Officer in Tree Felling Permission Case — No Prima Facie Case for Corruption or Forgery Established. Permission Granted by Competent Authority After Due Procedure Under Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964; Allegation of Application by Deceased Person Not Sufficient to Attract Offences Under IPC or Prevention of Corruption Act.

26 Mar 2013

The applicant, an IFS officer, was the Deputy Conservator of Forest at Wardha from 29.09.2006 to 16.08.2010. On 03.05.2006, one Govinda Mahagya Waskar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Crop Damage by Tigers in Agricultural Land - State Directed to Pay for Banana Plantation Loss. Forest Department's Recommendation for Compensation at Rs.48 per Plant Upheld; Finance Department's Refusal Based on No Policy Held Arbitrary.

15 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Baburao Abaji Aglawe, a retired government servant, owned agricultural land in Seloo, Wardha, where he cultivated banana plants on 5 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet Against Forest Officers in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Proximate Link Between Alleged Acts and Suicide. Suicide Note Did Not Name Petitioners; Allegations of Harassment Vague and Unsubstantiated, Not Attracting Section 306 IPC.

27 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Deepak Prabhakarrao Chondekar, Rajendra Madhukar Tongo, and Sopan Marotirao Potulwar, were forest officers serving in Pandharkawda, D...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Confiscation Appeal Order for Lack of Jurisdiction — Sessions Judge Not Competent to Hear Appeal Under Section 61(D) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Applicable to Goa. The appeal against confiscation of vehicle for carrying timber without transit pass must be heard by the District Judge, not the Sessions Judge.

29 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Pandurang Laxman Naik, owner and driver of a Canter Pick up vehicle bearing No. GA 02 T 5440, filed a criminal writ petition before th...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)