Search Results for "Execution Proceedings"

6179 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6179 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds District Judge's Finding on Date of Possession in Land Acquisition Execution — Possession of Land Taken on 19/10/1979 and Structures on 23/09/1981 Based on Documentary Evidence.

The petitioners, decree holders, challenged the order of the District Judge, South Goa, dated 24/03/2003 in Execution Application No. 14 of 1997. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Land Acquisition Execution — Date of Possession Determined as 19/10/1979 for Land and 23/09/1981 for Structures Based on Documentary Evidence. District Judge's Finding of Fact Upheld as Supported by Panchanamas and Correspondence.

The petitioners, decree holders, challenged the order of the District Judge, South Goa, dated 24/03/2003 in Execution Application No. 14 of 1997. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Petitions — Upholds Execution Court's Refund Order for Overpaid Amount. Claimants directed to refund excess compensation as calculations by State authorities were found correct under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications arising from land acquisition compensation disputes. The petitioners, Jose Assuncao Afonso and the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Executing Court's Order Directing Bank to Deposit Amount in Execution Proceedings — Review Dismissed. Bank's Challenge Under Article 227 Fails as Executing Court's Order Was Within Jurisdiction and Not Contrary to Law.

The petitioner, Dena Bank, was the defendant no.2 in Special Civil Suit No.100/2007 filed by the respondent no.1 (since deceased, represented by legal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — Property Purchased Prior to Attachment Not Liable. Applicants' title upheld as sale deed executed before warrant of attachment under Order XXI Rule 54 CPC.

The case arises from execution proceedings initiated by Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. (claimant) against Vishal S. Bagadia and another...