Search Results for "Excise license"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Excise License Renewal for Bars and Restaurants Despite Minor Irregularities in Application Process. License Renewal Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defects When Licensee Has Substantially Complied with Conditions and Paid Fees.

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its excise authorities against orders of a learned Single Judge directing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Excise Commissioner's Order in CL-9 License Shifting Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Appellate Authority's Reversal of Shifting Permission Set Aside for Lack of Notice and Hearing to Licensee.

The petitioner, S.B. Manjunath, a CL-9 licensee running Moon Star Bar and Restaurant in Honnalli Town, Davanagere District, applied on 19.01.2024 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Cognizance in Bihar Excise Case — Private Vehicle Not a Public Place Under Section 53(a) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. Consumption of liquor in a private vehicle does not constitute an offence under Section 53(a) as the vehicle is not a 'public place' under the Act.

The appellants, all Rotarians, were travelling from Giridih, Jharkhand to Patna, Bihar in a private vehicle to attend a Rotary Club meeting on 25.06.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Interest Demand on CLIII License Renewal Fee. Excise Department Cannot Levy Interest Without Specific Statutory Provision Under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 or Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953.

The petitioners, Maheshprasad Dwarkadas Jaiswal and Rajeshwar Dwarkadas Jaiswal, are CLIII license holders for a liquor shop at Shahabazar, Aurangabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...