Search Results for "Employer-Employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Employer-Employee"

52 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Divisional Commissioner Has No Jurisdiction Under Section 267A of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 to Set Aside Appointment of Anganwadi Sevika Made Under Integrated Child Development Scheme. The Commissioner's power under Section 267A is limited to appointments made under the Act and Rules, not to appointments under a Central Government Scheme like ICDS.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Sangita Ulhas Gadilkar, was appointed as an Anganwadi Sevika under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) by the Child Develop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Factory Worker's Right Leg Amputated Due to Machine Accident; Compensation of Rs.5,63,795 with 12% Interest Upheld Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

4 Sep 2019

The present appeal was filed by original respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Jeev Urja Private Limited and its Executive Director Vasant Kulkarni) challenging the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Labour Court Award in Favor of Workman in MSRTC Dismissal Case — 25% Back Wages Granted for Procedural Violation. Dismissal Quashed as Enquiry Officer Was Not Appointed by Competent Authority Under Section 6(6) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2019

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and award dated 4.8.2018 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Employees' Union and Individual Claimant in Company Liquidation Dispute — Upholds Official Liquidator's Decision to Reject Claims as Time-Barred Under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that workmen's dues, though entitled to priority, must be claimed within the limitation period prescribed under Rule 148 of the Company Court Rules, 1959.

8 Aug 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by the Kamani Employees' Union and Mrs. Triveni A. Kulkarni against the Official Liquidator and others. The disput...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councilor for Office of Profit — Secretary of Watershed Committee Not an Office of Profit Under Section 16(1)(h) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the position of Secretary of a Watershed Management Committee with an honorarium of Rs.3,000 per month does not constitute an office of profit under the Act.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Bhagwat Digambarrao Uphad, was elected as a Councilor of the Zilla Parishad. Respondent No.6, Vikram Hanumantrao Uphad, filed an appli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Directions for Regularization of Workers. Industrial Court's findings on completion of 240 days and unfair labour practices upheld, with directions to send proposals for permanency.

17 Jul 2019

The petitioner, the Municipal Council of Kalamb, filed three writ petitions challenging identical judgments dated 22/08/2017 passed by the Industrial ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in MSRTC Employee Dismissal Case. Employer's Domestic Enquiry Found Vitiated Due to Denial of Reasonable Opportunity to Workman.

21 Jun 2016

The present writ petition was filed by the Manager, Central Workshop, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), Aurangabad, challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Fresh Appointment as Punishment in MSRTC Disciplinary Matter — Industrial Court's Dismissal of Complaint Confirmed. The Court held that an order of fresh appointment issued by the employer can be a valid punishment and does not presuppose dismissal, relying on the principle that the employer has discretion to impose a lesser punishment.

21 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Anil Vaijnath Arbad, was a Class C employee of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) who joined service on 07.03.19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reemployment of Head Master Beyond Superannuation in Minority Institution - Government Circular Cannot Override Statutory Rules Under MEPS Act, 1977. The Court held that a Government circular requiring prior approval for reemployment beyond superannuation cannot override the statutory provisions of the MEPS Act and Rules, which do not impose such a condition for minority institutions.

27 Mar 2014

The petitioners, Syed Ishaque Syed Nabi (Head Master) and Shah Babu Education Society (a minority educational institution), challenged the refusal of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Award Reinstating 48 Workmen with Full Back Wages. Contractor's Workmen Held to Be Direct Employees Under Company's Control and Supervision, Award Upheld Under Article 227.

16 Jan 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Glasstech Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an award dated 30-06-2012 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, in Reference ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)