Search Results for "Employees Provident Funds Act"

326 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 326 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging PF Liability for Contract Workers. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Para 30 of EPF Scheme for Non-Compliance by Contractors.

The petitioner, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged an order dated 1.7.2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Apparel Companies Challenging Provident Fund Damages Order. Establishment of separate code number for each unit does not absolve liability under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by apparel companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and others...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Damages Under Provident Fund Act; Directs Recalculation as per Clause 32A of the Scheme. Damages at Rates Up to 100% Per Annum Found Not Related to Delay; RPFC Directed to Redetermine Quantum After Hearing Consistent with Precedent.

The petitioner, M/s. Standard Meter Mfg. Company, an establishment covered under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes PF Orders for Violation of Natural Justice in M/s Ashmit Motors Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside as passed without hearing the establishment.

The petitioner, M/s Ashmit Motors Private Limited, a car dealership, challenged two orders passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner: (1) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Applicability and Dues for Seasonal Cotton Processing Unit. Employer's failure to produce records despite multiple opportunities leads to confirmation of liability under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s Ranisati Ginning Factory, a proprietorship engaged in cotton processing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...