WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017
5 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "EXIM policy"
73 result(s) found
Found 73 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Interest is Leviable on Additional Duty of Customs and Settlement Commission's Power to Rectify Errors. The Court Scrutinised the Legality of Imposing Interest on Counter Veiling Duty Where Modvat Credit Was Available and Considered Whether Tribunals Have Inherent Jurisdiction to Correct Accidental Mistakes Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.
27 Apr 2005The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a public limited company engaged in manufacturing automotive furnishing fabrics, challenging the order ...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court hears appeal against CESTAT order upholding duty demand and confiscation of diamonds due to shortage and non-compliance with export obligations — substantial questions raised on interpretation of Notification No. 177/94-Cus and para 8.78B of Handbook of Procedures.
9 May 2012The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery studded with diamonds at its unit in the Santacruz Electronics...
- 45
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Revision Petitions Challenging Denial of CST Exemption for Lease Transactions; Examines Whether Post-Import Lease Constitutes Sale in Course of Import Under Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The court analyzed the transaction structure, including master lease agreements, purchase orders, bills of entry, and acceptance certificates, to determine if the lease occasioned import or involved transfer of documents before customs clearance.
19 Feb 2016Background: The dispute involves tax revision petitions filed by Hewlett Packard Financial Services India Private Limited (the petitioner) against the...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.
2 Apr 2019The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...
- 148
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute. n-Hexane Held to be a Separate Chemical Compound, Not Petroleum Oil, Under Customs Tariff Heading 2901.10 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2901.90.
30 Nov -0001The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, against the decision of CESTAT, Ahmedabad, which had dismissed the Revenue's appea...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Nigerian National in Customs Confiscation Case — Orders Release of Life-Saving Medicines and Miscellaneous Items. Detention of Passport for 75 Days Held Unauthorized; Confiscation of Medicines Set Aside as Goods Were Not Prohibited and Petitioner Had Valid Documents.
7 Oct 2010The petitioner, Okwy Shedrack Akpuba, a Nigerian national and businessman dealing in medicines, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Madras Hears Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Duty Demand on Photographic Film Conversion — Tribunal's Order on Revenue Neutrality and Limitation Questioned. Revenue challenges CESTAT's order setting aside duty demand of Rs. 20,37,33,174 under Section 11A(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 on grounds of revenue neutrality and time-bar.
23 Jul 2026Background: The appeal arose from a central excise duty demand on a company engaged in converting jumbo rolls of photographic films and trading import...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Advance Authorizations for Import of Areca Nuts — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Import of Areca Nuts under Advance Authorization Scheme for Export of Betel Nuts (Supari) Held Permissible Under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.
24 Jul 2018The petitioners, Taj Agro Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shadi-Ram & Sons Pvt. Ltd., and Himatlal Hirji & Co., were granted advance authorizations under the F...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Case — Redemption Fine and Penalty Reduced for Import of Used Personal Effects. Gold chain with diamond pendant held to be 'personal effects' under Baggage Rules, 1998, entitling duty-free import.
5 Jul 2024The petitioner, a US citizen of Indian origin, arrived in Mumbai on 6th May 2007 from New York. He was wearing a gold chain with a pendant embedded wi...
- 630
