Search Results for "EIA Notification"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.

The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Developer Challenging Quashing of Environmental Clearance for Housing Project Near Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. Project Located in Catchment Area of Sukhna Lake Requires Central Government Clearance Under Category 'A' of EIA Notification.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. (Tata HDCL) against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging NGT Order on Environmental Clearance for Hotel Construction in Coastal Zone. Court upholds NGT's finding that construction violated CRZ Notification and EIA Notification, requiring prior environmental clearance.

The petitioner, M/s. Leading Hotels, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Environmental Clearance for Mining Project — Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006.

The petitioners, residents of Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the environmental clearance grante...