Search Results for "Dispute Resolution Panel"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Hand Over Vacant Possession of Land Unauthorizedly Appropriated Without Acquisition — Senior Citizen's Land Used for Layout Formation Without Due Process.

The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Part, Upholds Reinstatement but Reduces Back Wages to 25% in School Tribunal Termination Case. Employee's Cross-Appeal for Full Back Wages Dismissed as Termination Found Justified on Merits but Procedural Defect in Enquiry.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a dispute between an employer trust and an employee regarding termination of service. The em...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...