Search Results for "Development Plan 2034"

97 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Directing Grant of Amenity TDR for Garden Development. High Court Allowed Writ Petition Challenging BMC's Denial of TDR and Directed Grant of Additional Amenity TDR Under Section 126 of MRTP Act.

The dispute centers on the entitlement to additional amenity Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for a garden developed on land reserved for a publi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Reservation for Garden Under MRTP Act, 1966 Due to Failure to Acquire Within One Year of Notice. Reservation Lapses Absolutely as No Declaration Under Section 126 Was Published Despite Proposal to Collector.

The petitioners, owners of two parcels of land in Borivali, Mumbai, filed writ petitions seeking a declaration that the reservation of their lands for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Challenge to Regularisation Certificate Issued Under Mixed Land Use Policy for Diagnostic Centre in Residential Area. High Court Had Declined Writ Jurisdiction Over the Matter.

The case involved a dispute over a diagnostic centre operating in a residential building in Hauz Khas, New Delhi. The appellant, Anirudh Kumar, a resi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...