Search Results for "Deputy Tahsildar"

590 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Limitation for Challenge.

The appellant, Sunil Chajed, claimed to be the owner of land measuring 1 acre and 4.08 guntas bearing Sy.No.91/1A. The Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Denial of Ryotwari Patta for Tank Poramboke Land. Land Classified as 'Peddacheruvu Tank' Under Section 2-A of Andhra Pradesh Inams (Abolition & Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 Cannot Be Granted Ryotwari Patta.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the implementation of ryotwari pattas allegedly granted in 1980 to the appellants' predecessor-in-interest for la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase of Land Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court Upheld the Revenue Tribunal's Order Confirming the Tenant's Purchase, Finding No Error of Law or Fact.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners (original applicants/landlords) and the respondents (original non-applicants/tenants) concerning a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Revisional Order in Land Conversion Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Change Land Use Upheld. Deputy Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Satish Hegde, purchased four acres of land in Sy.No.58 (New Sy.No.141) at Singrahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, under a registered s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Land Dispute Appeal. Delay of 1,000 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Not Sufficiently Explained, No Interference Under Article 227.

The petitioners, who were the defendants in O.S. No. 48/2006 on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) at Periyapatna, filed an appeal under Section 96 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...