Search Results for "Departmental disciplinary proceedings"

1038 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1038 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Retired University Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Discipline Rules. Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Voluntary Retirement Cannot Be Sustained Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 Without Specific Provision.

The petitioner, Manohar B. Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. He applied for voluntary retirement and w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order Against Railway Employee Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Independent Application of Mind by Disciplinary Authority. Disciplinary Authority Acted at Behest of Vigilance Department Without Independent Reasoning, Rendering the Penalty of Removal Unsustainable.

The petitioner, a railway employee, was appointed as a Junior Porter in 1989 and promoted to Senior Porter in 1992 and Cabin Master in 1997. In 2000, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Departmental Inquiry Against Headmaster Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Alleged Procedural Violations Including Defective Inquiry Committee and Denial of Statement of Allegations Examined.

The petitioner, a Headmaster of a private school governed by the MEPS Act and Rules, challenged his termination following a departmental inquiry. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Punishment

The petitioner, Ramrao Maroti Shinde, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was subjected to a departmental enquiry in May...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Judicial Officer in Disciplinary Proceedings for Misconduct. Non-Supply of Enquiry Report Before Final Order Does Not Vitiate Proceedings Absent Prejudice.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, joined the Maharashtra Judicial Service in 1990. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him, and an enqui...