Search Results for "Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum"

139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Against State Consumer Commission's Order Directing District Commission to Decide Complaint. Petitioner Challenges Order Allowing Revision Petition Under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The writ petition arose from an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench, Nagpur, which allowed a revision petition an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Electricity Ombudsman's Order Allowing Refund of Excess Tariff Charged to Industrial Consumer. Limitation Period Under MERC Regulations Not Applicable to Continuing Wrong of Wrongful Billing at Commercial Tariff Instead of Industrial Tariff.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the order dated 22/01/2016 passed by the Electricity O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order Compelling Amendment of Consumer Complaint in Insurance Claim Dispute. Complainant is Dominus Litis and Cannot Be Forced to Amend Pleadings.

The appellant, M/s Acme Cleantech Solutions Private Limited, filed a consumer complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows University's Petition to Quash Consumer Forum Proceedings. Educational Services Not Covered Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioner, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, a statutory university established under the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition Against Rejection of Leave to Join Liquidator in Consumer Complaint. Section 107 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 does not require notice to Liquidator before granting leave to sue.

The petitioner, Akola Municipal Corporation, had deposited Rs. 1,31,00,000 with the respondent no.1 Bank in a fixed deposit for 31 days at 9.5% intere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Forum Conveniens Objection in Writ Petition Against Tribunal's Pre-Deposit Waiver Refusal. Developer Challenges Order Requiring Deposit Under Section 43(5) of RERA Act While Flat Purchaser Objects to Principal Seat Jurisdiction.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenged the order dated 7 April 2021 of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Credit Society for Deficiency in Service. Fixed Deposit Holder is a Consumer Under Section 2(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, including the Kala Hanuman Urban Credit Society and its directors, challenged an order dated 25 February 2009 passed by the District ...