WRIT PETITION NO.19366 OF 2024
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Confiscation proceedings"
284 result(s) found
Found 284 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.
19 Nov 2022The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Import of Peas Under Restricted Category Based on Pre-Notification Contracts. Petitioners' goods cleared as contracts entered prior to amendment notification dated 29.03.2019 under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.
15 Oct 2020The petitioners, M/s. Harihar Collections and M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP, are engaged in the import and export of agricultural commodities. They imported...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Petition Challenging Confiscation of Essential Commodities and Vehicle Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 — Failure to Comply with Section 6-A(2) Mandate of Summary Trial Within Reasonable Time Renders Confiscation Proceedings Invalid. The court held that a delay of over three years in concluding confiscation proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 is unreasonable and vitiates the order of confiscation.
13 Feb 2017The petitioner, Sachin Vishvanath Naik, challenged the judgment and order dated 3.10.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Ponda, wh...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — Confiscation of Indian Currency Not Sustainably Linked to Smuggling. CESTAT's finding that Revenue failed to establish necessary ingredients for invoking Section 121 of Customs Act, 1962 upheld.
8 Sep 2010The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai filed an appeal against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) d...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.
25 Apr 2006The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Release of Confiscated Truck in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Not Given Adequate Opportunity of Hearing. Confiscation Order Under Section 61-A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.
20 Apr 2006The petitioner, owner of a truck bearing registration number MH-30-B-2897, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 139
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Confiscation Appeal Order for Lack of Jurisdiction — Sessions Judge Not Competent to Hear Appeal Under Section 61(D) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 as Applicable to Goa. The appeal against confiscation of vehicle for carrying timber without transit pass must be heard by the District Judge, not the Sessions Judge.
29 Sep 2005The petitioner, Pandurang Laxman Naik, owner and driver of a Canter Pick up vehicle bearing No. GA 02 T 5440, filed a criminal writ petition before th...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.
19 Apr 2005The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...
- 281
