Search Results for "Confiscation Liability"

151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seizure and Confiscation of Medical Equipment Imported Under Customs Duty Exemption — Limitation Period Under Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Mandates Return of Seized Goods if No Notice Issued Within Six Months

The petitioners, Insight Diagnostic Oncological & Research Institute Private Limited and Dr. Anil V. Purohit, imported a Computerised Treadmill on 11 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Act Case — Master of Vessel Solely Liable for Import Manifest Errors. Agents Filing Manifest on Behalf of Master Not Liable Under Sections 30 and 148(2) of Customs Act, 1962.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports) against M/s Patvolk and M/s Shahi Containers. The dispute arose from the arrival ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging PMLA Attachment — Section 32A IBC Immunity Overrides Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA. Resolution Plan Approved for Corporate Debtor Shields Assets from Enforcement Directorate's Attachment.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by individuals (Shiv Charan, Pushpalata Bai, and Bharti Agarwal) challenging a provisional attachment or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 138 NI Act Complaint Against Directors Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Complaint against directors quashed as complaint lacked specific allegations of their role in company's conduct.

The applicants, K & K Foundry Pvt. Ltd. and its two directors, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...