Search Results for "Concurrent User"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Concurrent User"

266 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Use of 'RPG' Mark by Defendants in Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The court held that the Defendants' use of 'RPG' as a prominent feature in their trade name was deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and likely to cause confusion.

21 Mar 2022

The Plaintiff, RPG Enterprises Limited, a multi-industry Indian conglomerate, filed a suit against the Defendants, Riju Ghoshal and Poulami Ghoshal, f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

9 Sep 2020

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Registrar's Order Rejecting Trade Mark Application Due to Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Honest Concurrent Use. The Court held that the Registrar's order was unreasoned and ignored material on honest concurrent use under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, violating statutory requirements under Sections 18(5) and 91.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a petition filed by Petitioner challenging an order dated 19 May 2025 by the Registrar of Trade Marks, which rejected the petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition for Eviction on Ground of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Landlord's Own Witness Admitted No Need for Possession, Defeating Claim Under Rent Control Law.

21 Aug 2015

The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Kolhapur, filed a suit for eviction against the tenant on grounds of non-user, erection of perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Involving 'Kalpataru' Mark. The plaintiff, a well-known real estate developer, successfully restrained the defendants from using the mark 'Kalpataru' for their housing project, as it was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered and well-known trademark.

9 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer established in 1975, has used the mark 'Kalpataru' as an integral part of its c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

17 Dec 2024

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Easement of Way Claim — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Prescriptive Easement Claim Fails as Plaintiff Failed to Prove User as of Right for 20 Years Under Section 15 of the Easements Act, 1882.

28 Nov 2014

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a suit seeking a declaration of easement of way by prescription over a motorable access running through the d...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)