Search Results for "Collusive Claim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Collusive Claim"

178 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 178 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Condonation of 586-Day Delay and Grant of Leave to Appeal to Pendente Lite Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit. The Court held that subsequent purchasers who purchased property during pendency of suit and in violation of injunction cannot claim bona fide status and have no right to appeal after their impleadment application was rejected and became final.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves appeals by the original plaintiffs (H. Anjanappa & Ors.) against an order of the Karnataka High Court condoning a delay of 586 days ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Garnishee Order Against Respondent in Execution of Decree — Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets Constitutes Admission of Liability. The Court directed attachment and deposit of Rs. 17,40,82,984/- under Order XXI Rules 46 and 46A CPC, finding no real dispute under Rule 46-C.

11 Nov 2024

The Applicant, Drive India Enterprises Solutions Ltd., is the Judgment Creditor in a decree dated 10th September 2018 against the Judgment Debtor, Hai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

26 Jul 2022

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Executing Court's Order Refusing to Recall Warrant of Possession Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court's Discretion to Refuse Recall of Warrant After Delivery of Possession Upheld as No Material Irregularity Shown.

25 Jul 2022

The petitioners, original decree holders in Execution Application No. 22/2008, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Challenging Tenancy Proceedings, Remands for Trial on Limitation and Jurisdiction. Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Set Aside as Limitation and Civil Court Bar Under Section 85 of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Are Triable Issues Requiring Evidence.

17 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed in 1987 by 13 plaintiffs claiming to be legal representatives of Haji Ali Mohammed Hajee Kassam Agboatw...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Before Repeal. Application for Exemption Under Section 20 Rejected as Land Had Vested in State; No Abatement Upon Repeal.

1 Aug 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing a writ petition challenging the rejection of an exemption application under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in Review Petition — Delay of 89 Days Not Sufficiently Explained, Limitation Period for Review Not Extended by Supreme Court's Liberty. The court held that pursuing a Special Leave Petition does not constitute sufficient cause for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the liberty granted by the Supreme Court does not extend the limitation period for filing a review.

25 Apr 2019

The applicants, who were not parties to the original suit, had filed a Second Appeal (No. 21/2018) which was dismissed as not maintainable by the Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Axis Bank's Application to be Joined as Party in Multiple Suits Against Orbit Corporation Ltd. — Bank's Right to Defend Its Mortgage Interest Recognized. The court held that a mortgagee bank has a right to be heard in suits for specific performance of agreements for sale of mortgaged properties, as its interest would be affected by any decree.

2 Aug 2017

The judgment concerns multiple notices of motion filed by Axis Bank Limited seeking to be joined as a party in various suits filed by flat purchasers ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleading Application in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioner Entitled to be Heard Before Compromise Decree Affecting Her Rights. The court held that a person whose rights are directly affected by a compromise decree in a subsequent suit is a necessary and proper party under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, and the trial court erred in rejecting the impleading application.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Narayanamma, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (OS 2289/2007) against respondents 1 to 3 based on an agreement to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Cases — Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages as Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Was Illegal. The court upheld the Labour Court's finding that retrenchment of workmen who had completed 240 days of service was void for non-compliance with Section 25-F, and reinstatement with full back wages was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Godrej Industries Ltd. (formerly Godrej Soaps Ltd.), employed the respondents as workmen. The respondents were retrenched by the appell...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)