Search Results for "Co-owners Consent"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Co-owners Consent"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Seeking Survey and Demarcation of Joint Property, Directs Tahsildar to Conduct Survey After Obtaining Co-owners' Consent and Hearing Objectors. Court Directs Petitioner to Obtain Consent from Brother and Sister, Hearing of Objectors Before Survey, and Declines to Order Fencing by Respondents.

27 Mar 2025

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a pattathar seeking a mandamus directing the District Collector, Tahsildar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Preliminary Agreement Not Amounting to Conveyance — Agreement for Sale Without Immediate Possession Not Deemed Conveyance Under Article 25(b) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that a preliminary agreement for sale where possession is not delivered immediately cannot be treated as a conveyance under Explanation I to Article 25 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

17 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Narendra Janardan Pathak and others, entered into a 'preliminary agreement' dated 21 February 2011 with the respondents-vendors for t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowner's Writ Petition Against Bank's Claim Over Land Acquisition Compensation Due to Charge on Acquired Land. Bank's Charge on Land Under Acquisition Made It an Interested Person Eligible to Claim Apportionment of Compensation Under Section 30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Damu Patil, owned agricultural land in Dhule, which was acquired for the Lower Tapi Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligation Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC Without Evidence of Dishonest Intention at Inception.

10 Dec 2015

The judgment arises from a criminal application and writ petition filed by Mahendra Premji Gangar and Kalyanji Premji Gangar (applicants/petitioners),...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute Between Siblings. Court holds that amendment seeking to add alternative claim for partition and separate possession does not change the nature of the suit and is necessary for effective adjudication.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioners, Barkatali Abdul Razzak Kazi, Noorjahan Gafoor Shijwalkar, and Aishabi Jabbar Thakur, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sealing Order Under Section 18 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 — Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice from Procedural Irregularities. Typographical Error in Designation of Authority Does Not Vitiate Order When Power Was Validly Conferred.

25 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Sharada Premlal Chhadi, aged 65 years, was the occupier of House No.6, City Survey No.175/528, Nagpur. She was allegedly running ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Indecent Representation of Women Act Case — No Offence Made Out as Alleged Obscene Painting Was Not Published or Distributed. Court holds that mere possession of a painting in a private residence without any element of publication, distribution, or public exhibition does not constitute an offence under Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 or Section 292(2)(a) of the Indian Penal Code.

10 May 2013

The petitioner, Chintan Upadhyay, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of C...

2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)