KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "Cauvery Calling"
46 result(s) found
Found 46 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Tamil Nadu's Suit Against Karnataka Over Pennaiyar River Water Dispute, Upholds 1892 Agreement as Binding and Directs Parties to Tribunal Under Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956
2 Feb 2026The State of Tamil Nadu filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against Karnataka and the Union of India, challenging Karnataka's ...
- 802
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Housing Board's Notification Restricting Allotment of Commercial Sites to Landowners in Land Acquisition Case. Condition No. 2 of Notification Dated 03.09.2016 Limiting Allotment to Residential Sites Only Upheld as Reasonable and Not Arbitrary.
9 Aug 2024The petitioners, Yallappa S/o Somappa Kori and others, were landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Housing Board for a housing scheme. ...
- 150
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds District Task Force Committee's Power to Cancel Mining Licences for Violations of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994. The court held that the Committee has quasi-judicial authority to revoke quarrying licences for non-compliance with statutory conditions, including illegal transportation and failure to maintain records.
19 Jun 2024The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several individuals, including Sri S.R. Bellary and Sri A.J. Kalkeri, challenging the reso...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Binding Precedent. Order of Commissioner for Cane Development set aside for being contrary to earlier court direction and lacking reasons.
6 Jan 2023The petitioners, M/S. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S. Shri. Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...
- 76
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Previous Court Direction. Order passed without considering objections and contrary to earlier writ court direction to hear petitioners before granting licence to third party.
6 Jan 2023The petitioners, M/s. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s. Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and ...
- 74
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers Review Petitions on Women's Entry to Sabarimala Temple to Larger Bench — Constitutional Questions on Religious Freedom and Essential Practices Require Authoritative Determination by Seven-Judge Bench. The court identified an apparent conflict between Shirur Mutt and Durgah Committee regarding judicial review of essential religious practices under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
14 Nov 2019The Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 14, 2019, disposed of a batch of review petitions and connected matters arising from the earlier judgm...
- 362
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.
28 Aug 2017The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.
24 Apr 2015The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Employee Compensation Case — Interim Payment Not Deductible from Final Compensation Under Section 8(1) of Employees Compensation Act, 1923. Court holds that interim compensation voluntarily paid by employer cannot be deducted from the amount deposited under Section 8(1) as the Act does not provide for such deduction.
26 Sep 2013The appeal was filed by the parents of Miss Sujata Siddharth Survase, who died in the Mangalore air crash on 22 May 2010 while working as a crew membe...
- 92
